public interface TableOnStep<R extends Record>
JOIN clause,
 where there must be a join criteria added using an ON clause
 (with a Condition), or using a USING clause (with a list
 of Field).| Modifier and Type | Method and Description | 
|---|---|
| TableOnConditionStep<R> | on(Boolean condition)Deprecated. 
 - 3.8.0 - [#4763] - Use  on(Condition...)oron(Field)instead. Due to ambiguity between
             calling this method usingField.equals(Object)argument, vs. calling the other method via aField.equal(Object)argument, this method will be
             removed in the future. | 
| TableOnConditionStep<R> | on(Condition... conditions) | 
| TableOnConditionStep<R> | on(Field<Boolean> condition)Add an  ONclause to theJOIN. | 
| TableOnConditionStep<R> | on(SQL sql)Add an  ONclause to theJOIN. | 
| TableOnConditionStep<R> | on(String sql)Add an  ONclause to theJOIN. | 
| TableOnConditionStep<R> | on(String sql,
  Object... bindings)Add an  ONclause to theJOIN. | 
| TableOnConditionStep<R> | on(String sql,
  QueryPart... parts)Add an  ONclause to theJOIN. | 
| TableOnConditionStep<R> | onKey()Join the table on a non-ambiguous foreign key relationship between the
 two joined tables. | 
| TableOnConditionStep<R> | onKey(ForeignKey<?,?> key)Join the table on a non-ambiguous foreign key relationship between the
 two joined tables. | 
| TableOnConditionStep<R> | onKey(TableField<?,?>... keyFields)Join the table on a non-ambiguous foreign key relationship between the
 two joined tables. | 
| Table<Record> | using(Collection<? extends Field<?>> fields)Join a table with the  USING(column [, column...]) | 
| Table<Record> | using(Field<?>... fields)Join a table with the  USING(column [, column...]) | 
@Support TableOnConditionStep<R> on(Condition... conditions)
@Support TableOnConditionStep<R> on(Field<Boolean> condition)
ON clause to the JOIN.@Deprecated @Support TableOnConditionStep<R> on(Boolean condition)
on(Condition...) or
             on(Field) instead. Due to ambiguity between
             calling this method using Field.equals(Object)
             argument, vs. calling the other method via a
             Field.equal(Object) argument, this method will be
             removed in the future.ON clause to the JOIN.@Support @PlainSQL TableOnConditionStep<R> on(SQL sql)
ON clause to the JOIN.
 NOTE: When inserting plain SQL into jOOQ objects, you must guarantee syntax integrity. You may also create the possibility of malicious SQL injection. Be sure to properly use bind variables and/or escape literals when concatenated into SQL clauses!
DSL.condition(SQL), 
SQL@Support @PlainSQL TableOnConditionStep<R> on(String sql)
ON clause to the JOIN.
 NOTE: When inserting plain SQL into jOOQ objects, you must guarantee syntax integrity. You may also create the possibility of malicious SQL injection. Be sure to properly use bind variables and/or escape literals when concatenated into SQL clauses!
DSL.condition(String), 
SQL@Support @PlainSQL TableOnConditionStep<R> on(String sql, Object... bindings)
ON clause to the JOIN.
 NOTE: When inserting plain SQL into jOOQ objects, you must guarantee syntax integrity. You may also create the possibility of malicious SQL injection. Be sure to properly use bind variables and/or escape literals when concatenated into SQL clauses!
DSL.condition(String, Object...), 
SQL@Support @PlainSQL TableOnConditionStep<R> on(String sql, QueryPart... parts)
ON clause to the JOIN.
 NOTE: When inserting plain SQL into jOOQ objects, you must guarantee syntax integrity. You may also create the possibility of malicious SQL injection. Be sure to properly use bind variables and/or escape literals when concatenated into SQL clauses!
DSL.condition(String, QueryPart...), 
SQL@Support Table<Record> using(Field<?>... fields)
USING(column [, column...]) syntax.
 If this is not supported by your RDBMS, then jOOQ will try to emulate this behaviour using the information provided in this query.
@Support Table<Record> using(Collection<? extends Field<?>> fields)
USING(column [, column...]) syntax.
 If this is not supported by your RDBMS, then jOOQ will try to emulate this behaviour using the information provided in this query.
@Support TableOnConditionStep<R> onKey() throws DataAccessException
 See onKey(ForeignKey) for examples.
DataAccessException - If there is no non-ambiguous key definition
             known to jOOQonKey(ForeignKey)@Support TableOnConditionStep<R> onKey(TableField<?,?>... keyFields) throws DataAccessException
 See onKey(ForeignKey) for examples.
DataAccessException - If there is no non-ambiguous key definition
             known to jOOQonKey(ForeignKey)@Support TableOnConditionStep<R> onKey(ForeignKey<?,?> key)
 An example: 
 // There is a single foreign key relationship between A and B and it can
 // be obtained by A.getReferencesTo(B) or vice versa. The order of A and
 // B is not important
 A.join(B).onKey();
 // There are several foreign key relationships between A and B. In order
 // to disambiguate, you can provide a formal org.jooq.Key reference from
 // the generated Keys class
 A.join(B).onKey(key);
 // There are several foreign key relationships between A and B. In order
 // to disambiguate, you can provide any non-ambiguous foreign key column
 A.join(B).onKey(B.A_ID);
 
Copyright © 2016. All Rights Reserved.